Re: The Geejay

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Thu Jan 03 2008 - 08:25:03 CST

Next message: John Hudson: "Re: The Geejay"

Previous message: Otto Stolz: "Re: The Geejay"
In reply to: Otto Stolz: "Re: The Geejay"
Next in thread: Dominikus Scherkl: "Re: The Geejay"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 15:17 +0100 2008-01-03, Otto Stolz wrote:

>>On foot of the shape of the letter I would
>>consider encoding it as the capital form of
>>U+0261, as LATIN CAPITAL LETTER SCRIPT G.
>
>And what about that dot on the »j« part of the glyph?

Irrelevant glyph variation.

-- 
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com

Next message: John Hudson: "Re: The Geejay"
Previous message: Otto Stolz: "Re: The Geejay"
In reply to: Otto Stolz: "Re: The Geejay"
Next in thread: Dominikus Scherkl: "Re: The Geejay"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 03 2008 - 08:29:02 CST