From: vunzndi@vfemail.net
Date: Tue Apr 01 2008 - 18:44:29 CST
Dear Michael,
Since it is still April 1st in the US, then one might add that the
characters for CJK Extension B, U+E02EC, and C, U+E02ED are the same,
and that it would be better to leave reserved spaces for other CJK
extensions.
John Knightley
Quoting Tom <applemeister@f2s.com>:
> Similarly, there exists a glyph for UNDEFINED that doesn't contain any
> plane number. It is just a simple square with diagonal lines, with the
> text "UNDEFINED" printed on the northern and southern sides; "0000" on
> the western side; and "FFFF" on the eastern.
>
> I haven't seen that glyph in the table.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> An Apple a day keeps Microsoft away
>
> Second Lt. Applemeister of the 68k Macintosh Liberation Army
>
>
>
> On 1 Apr 2008, at 22:58, Dominikus Scherkl wrote:
>
>> Michael Everson schrieb:
>>> Please see
>>> http://www.evertype.com/standards/iso10646/pdf/n3412-last-resort.pdf
>>
>> Nice first of April post.
>>
>> But if this is a serious proposal, there are some errors:
>> - The name of E02A8 should be "LR-10000-1FFFD PLANE-1 UNDEFINED",
>> not "LR-0000-FFFD PLANE-1 UNDEFINED"
>> - No glyphs for "PLANE-3 UNDEFINED" to "PLANE-13 UNDEFINED"
>> and "PLANE-3 NOT A CHARACTER" to "PLANE-13 NOT A CHARACTER"
>> (ok, there are no chars assigned, but the more important
>> those glyphs would be!)
>> - I still think the Glyph "A" for latin is a very bad choice,
>> as this very same glyph is also in cyrillic and greek used.
>> Why not some glyph that is unique to latin, and at the same
>> time represents the name of the script quite well, like the
>> "L" glyph?
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> --
>>
>> Dominikus Scherkl
>>
>>
-------------------------------------------------
This message sent through Virus Free Email
http://www.vfemail.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Apr 01 2008 - 21:04:48 CST