From: Marion Gunn (mgunn@egt.ie)
Date: Thu Apr 10 2008 - 05:48:02 CDT
Thank you for that comprehensive explication, Kenneth, which amounts to
saying, if I understand you correctly, that it would have been more
correct for me to say "ISO/IEC 10646 is an international standard
published in at least two independent languages, but the corresponding
Unicode standard is a commercial standard published only in US
(Anglo-American) English", (which, I trust, better answers the query
someone else raised concerning bilingualism in the matter of publishing
standards).
mg
Scríobh Kenneth Whistler:
> Marion Gunn said:
>
>
>> I believe it means, Dan, that ISO standards are international standards
>> published in at least two independent languages (European French and
>> British English), but Unicode standards are only commercial standards
>> published only in US (Anglo-American) English, but I could be wrong on
>> that point, so please do ask Unicode reps to confirm.
>>
>
> Well, I'm a Unicode rep, and I'll confirm that that is incorrect...
>
-- Marion Gunn * EGTeo (Estab.1991) 27 Páirc an Fhéithlinn, Baile an Bhóthair, Co. Átha Cliath, Éire. * mgunn@egt.ie * eamonn@egt.ie *
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Apr 10 2008 - 19:25:05 CDT