From: Leo Broukhis (leob@mailcom.com)
Date: Sat Jul 05 2008 - 12:03:01 CDT
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 1:49 AM, philip chastney
<philip_chastney@yahoo.com> wrote:
> addendum
> ---------------
> and why does this distinction hold for the first transfinite cardinal, but
> not for the first transfinite ordinal?
Are you sure it does not?
There are U+1D6DA, U+1D714, U+1D74E, U+1D788, U+1D7C2.
Leo
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Jul 05 2008 - 12:06:33 CDT