Re: Character list for European and Canadian use in the revised keyboard standard ISO/IEC 9995-3, supplementing MES-1

From: Benjamin M Scarborough (benjamin.scarborough@student.utdallas.edu)
Date: Thu Oct 16 2008 - 18:10:11 CDT

Next message: Karl Pentzlin: "Capital schwa vs. reversed E (Re: Character list for European and Canadian use in the revised keyboard standard ISO/IEC 9995-3, supplementing MES-1)"

Previous message: Karl Pentzlin: "Re: Character list for European and Canadian use in the revised keyboard standard ISO/IEC 9995-3, supplementing MES-1"
Maybe in reply to: Karl Pentzlin: "Re: Character list for European and Canadian use in the revised keyboard standard ISO/IEC 9995-3, supplementing MES-1"
Next in thread: Karl Pentzlin: "Capital schwa vs. reversed E (Re: Character list for European and Canadian use in the revised keyboard standard ISO/IEC 9995-3, supplementing MES-1)"
Reply: Karl Pentzlin: "Capital schwa vs. reversed E (Re: Character list for European and Canadian use in the revised keyboard standard ISO/IEC 9995-3, supplementing MES-1)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Karl Pentzlin wrote:
> The revision of ISO/IEC 9995-3 is done for this time. The result
> will be distributed for CD ballot.
> Extensive information about this revision can be found at:
> http://www.europatastatur.de/info1-9995-3.pdf

If I may ask, why does this include U+018E LATIN CAPITAL LETTER
REVERSED E without its lowercase counterpart, U+01DD LATIN SMALL LETTER
TURNED E?

--Ben Scarborough

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Oct 16 2008 - 18:13:58 CDT