From: Mark E. Shoulson (mark@kli.org)
Date: Sat Dec 27 2008 - 20:59:38 CST
John H. Jenkins wrote:
>
> On Dec 27, 2008, at 4:52 AM, Julian Bradfield wrote:
>
>> Yet tengwar are not yet encoded, and Shavian is!
>>
>
> Tengwar has not been encoded fundamentally because nobody is working
> to move the proposal forward (i.e., actively soliciting support from
> the user community, writing up the documentation necessary for the UTC
> and WG2, getting updates added to the appropriate agendae for
> consideration). It has been proposed and is currently still on the
> list of "scripts to encode."
> <http://www.unicode.org/pending/pending.html>
Whereas Klingon is formally *rejected* and not on the list of scripts to
encode for the crime of being too funny and embarrassing to encode. As
opposed to the much more dignified POOP emoji.
~mark
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jan 02 2009 - 15:33:07 CST