RE: Emoji: emoticons vs. literacy

From: Ruszlan Gaszanov (ruszlan@ather.net)
Date: Fri Jan 09 2009 - 07:59:38 CST

  • Next message: James Kass: "RE: Emoji: emoticons vs. literacy"

    Julian Bradfield wrote:

    >With just three code points:
    >BINARY NUMBER START
    >COMBINING BINARY DIGIT ZERO
    >COMBINING BINARY DIGIT ONE
    >you could unambigously encode arbitrary numbers

    Brilliant! Not just encode arbitrary numbers, but embed any arbitrary binary
    data into plain text! Imagine the benefit for millions of users [SARCASM
    MARK]

    >efficiently (in a theoretician's sense!) in Unicode;

    ...apart from the fact that each bit of information would require at least
    16 times more storage space and bandwidth then in raw binary format - but
    who cares about storage space and bandwidth these days? ;)

    Ruszlan



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jan 09 2009 - 08:01:30 CST