From: Christopher Fynn (chris.fynn@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Jan 12 2009 - 02:34:41 CST
On 07/01/2009, vunzndi@vfemail.net <vunzndi@vfemail.net> wrote:
> Quoting "Asmus Freytag" <asmusf@ix.netcom.com>:
>
>> On 1/6/2009 4:13 AM, Michael Everson wrote:
>>> On 6 Jan 2009, at 06:37, John Hudson wrote:
>>>
>>>> One might object that this means any emoji character would require
>>>> four bytes instead of two, but that is also true if Unicode
>>>> surrogate characters are used, and opposition to encoding emoji
>>>> within the BMP seems stiffer than opposition to encoding them per
>>>> se.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure I even want them in the SMP. I'm thinking Plane 14, at
>>> least for the dodgier ones.
>> Some people have made it clear they prefer plane 15 :-)
>>
>
> Or plane 16:-)
>
>> A./
Since these things can flap their wings and fly, residing on the upper
planes should pose no problem.
- C
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jan 12 2009 - 02:36:32 CST