Re: Unused Unicode planes

From: Doug Ewell (doug@ewellic.org)
Date: Wed Jan 14 2009 - 06:44:56 CST

Next message: Ruszlan Gaszanov: "RE: Emoji: emoticons vs. literacy"

Previous message: verdy_p: "RE: Encoding corporate logos by paid request"
In reply to: verdy_p: "Re: Unused Unicode planes"
Next in thread: vunzndi@vfemail.net: "Re: Emoji: emoticons vs. literacy"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

"verdy_p" <verdy underscore p at wanadoo dot fr> wrote:

> For me the "hypothetical" Everycode standard (which is a fully
> structured format that can embed arbitrary Unicode characters or texts
> as a subset or arbitrary binary data as well) already exists, and
> everyone in this list must already know it. In TUS, it is described as
> an "upper layer protocol", and its name is... "X M L".

It was Michael D'Errico's idea, not mine.

--
Doug Ewell  *  Thornton, Colorado, USA  *  RFC 4645  *  UTN #14
http://www.ewellic.org
http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages  ˆ

Next message: Ruszlan Gaszanov: "RE: Emoji: emoticons vs. literacy"
Previous message: verdy_p: "RE: Encoding corporate logos by paid request"
In reply to: verdy_p: "Re: Unused Unicode planes"
Next in thread: vunzndi@vfemail.net: "Re: Emoji: emoticons vs. literacy"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jan 14 2009 - 06:48:31 CST