From: Debbie Garside (debbie@ictmarketing.co.uk)
Date: Tue Mar 24 2009 - 08:10:15 CST
... the rise and fall of the British Empire... in driving terms ;-)
Nice bit of driving localization!  (note the s not z)
Debbie
-----Original Message-----
From: Tex Texin [mailto:textexin@xencraft.com] 
Sent: 24 March 2009 15:29
To: debbie@ictmarketing.co.uk
Cc: 'Vinod Kumar'; 'Unicode Mailing List'
Subject: RE: writing direction
Not even below the equator Debbie?
I prefer cursive scripts which is why I weave in and out of lanes  
rather than just stay in a straight line.
http://www.i18nguy.com/driver-side.html
tex
Quoting Debbie Garside <debbie@ictmarketing.co.uk>:
> But it will never make sense to me to drive anti-clockwise around a
> roundabout ;-)
>
>
>
> Debbie
>
>
>
>    _____
>
> From: unicode-bounce@unicode.org [mailto:unicode-bounce@unicode.org] On
> Behalf Of Vinod Kumar
> Sent: 24 March 2009 07:25
> To: Unicode Mailing List
> Subject: writing direction
>
>
>
> Please have  a look at
> HYPERLINK
>
"http://www.laughitout.com/2009/02/why-werent-you-successful-with-arabs.html
>
"http://www.laughitout.com/2009/02/why-werent-you-successful-with-arabs.html
> The  writing  direction  appears to  have a  profound influence on
> many everyday happenings just as the cola ad shows. Yesterday (Feb
> 18,  2009)  there   was  a  news   that  the Taliban  has enforced
> driving on the right side of the road  in  the  Swat   valley   of
> Pakistan because they write from RtoL.   Earlier,   because   of
>  the   British legacy,   they
> used   to   drive  along  the  left  of  the  road  just  like  us
> Indians.  But it beats me to tell the  connection  between reading
> from  right to left and driving on the right!
>
> A  quip  from  my  friend  Vijayaraman:  "Reading  Direction"  and
> "Driving direction"  relationship  is  something  one  can  ponder
> about!   If  there  is  such  a thing, I wonder how Japanese would
> drive their cars - they certainly write top to bottom!
>
> Thinking deeper into it,  there  might  be  a  connection  between
> writing  and  driving  directions. When you drive along, the trees
> and buildings on the left of the central vertical plane of  vision
> move  right  to left and the trees and buildings on the right move
> LtoR. This is the case whether you drive along  the  left  or  the
> right.
>
> Now consider the incoming traffic. On one way roads, or roads with
> dividers the  incoming  traffic  is  absent  or  can  be  ignored.
> Otherwise, as on most Indian roads, the incoming traffic has to be
> watched carefully.  When driving on the left of the road  (India),
> the  incoming  traffic  will move from LtoR. If we read from LtoR,
> the characters move in our visual space from RtoL. Hence,  if  the
> predominant  writing  direction  is LtoR, you should be driving on
> the right of the road as in US  to  watch  out  for  the  incoming
> traffic.  So  LtoR  writing  (English,  French) is compatible with
> driving on right  hand  side  of  the  road!   US  wins  over  UK.
> Incidently,  the  Taliban  has got it wrong here because they read
> from RtoL and should be driving on the left of the road as  we  do
> now in India and Pakistan .
>
> Now consider driving along, reading the sign boards on the side of
> the road you are on. This is normal as you wish to read the  board
> "Uncle  Tom's  Cabin",  get  down in front and have a mug of beer.
> Obviously the left of the road driving  is  comaptible  with  LtoR
> writing.   UK  wins over US. The Taliban is now right in insisting
> that everybody should drive on the right and read  the  signboards
> strictly written RtoL in Pashto, Urdu or Arabic.
>
> The  match  is  evenly  poised. Are there other considerations for
> deciding which side of the road a country should drive  given  its
> predominant  writing  direction?  Changing  the  writing direction
> looks impossible, but  changing  the  driving  side  has  a  faint
> glimmer of chance.
>
> K Vinod Kumar
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.11.25/2019 - Release Date:
23/03/2009
> 18:51
>
>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.11.25/2019 - Release Date:
23/03/2009
> 18:51
>
>
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG. 
Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.11.25/2019 - Release Date: 23/03/2009
18:51
 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG. 
Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.11.25/2019 - Release Date: 23/03/2009
18:51
 
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Mar 24 2009 - 08:12:56 CST