Re: On the possibility of encoding a portable interpretable object code into Unicode

From: Doug Ewell (doug@ewellic.org)
Date: Tue Mar 24 2009 - 20:03:36 CST

Next message: Zabeeh Khan: "Re: writing direction"

Previous message: James Cloos: "Re: Does OpenOffice 3.0 handle unicode?"
In reply to: William_J_G Overington: "On the possibility of encoding a portable interpretable object code into Unicode"
Next in thread: John (Eljay) Love-Jensen: "Re: On the possibility of encoding a portable interpretable object code into Unicode"
Reply: John (Eljay) Love-Jensen: "Re: On the possibility of encoding a portable interpretable object code into Unicode"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

"William_J_G Overington" <wjgo underscore 10009 at btinternet dot com>
wrote:

> I am hoping that one day a portable interpretable object code will be
> added to regular Unicode.

It wasn't an appropriate use of a character encoding standard when you
proposed it 7 years ago, and it isn't an appropriate use now.

--
Doug Ewell  *  Thornton, Colorado, USA  *  RFC 4645  *  UTN #14
http://www.ewellic.org
http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages  ˆ

Next message: Zabeeh Khan: "Re: writing direction"
Previous message: James Cloos: "Re: Does OpenOffice 3.0 handle unicode?"
In reply to: William_J_G Overington: "On the possibility of encoding a portable interpretable object code into Unicode"
Next in thread: John (Eljay) Love-Jensen: "Re: On the possibility of encoding a portable interpretable object code into Unicode"
Reply: John (Eljay) Love-Jensen: "Re: On the possibility of encoding a portable interpretable object code into Unicode"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Mar 24 2009 - 20:07:56 CST