RE: Invalid code points

• Previous message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Invalid code points"
• In reply to: Doug Ewell: "Re: Invalid code points"
• Next in thread: Hans Aberg: "Re: Invalid code points"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

>
> >> Besides, there are many fine transfer encoding syntaxes
> available for
> >> transmitting binary data that don't involve pretending that the
> data
> >> is text.
> >
> > Yes sure, but unfortunately, they can't be used in argument
> passing.
> > Setting up IPC just to get some arguments and environmental
> variables
> > is overkill. And it would not illustrate the idea of passing
> objects
> > in the arguments.
>
> I wasn't aware that the purpose of all this was to illustrate an
> idea.
>

Besides: there are other ways to pass objects in (string) arguments. See, for example, http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-2/

Addison

• Next message: Hans Aberg: "Re: Invalid code points"
• Previous message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Invalid code points"
• In reply to: Doug Ewell: "Re: Invalid code points"
• Next in thread: Hans Aberg: "Re: Invalid code points"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jun 01 2009 - 22:51:21 CDT