Re: Confusion about weak and strong disunification

From: Shriramana Sharma (samjnaa@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Aug 16 2009 - 22:08:35 CDT

Next message: Shriramana Sharma: "Where went indic at unicode dot org?"

Previous message: Robert Abel: "Re: Support of U+00AD SOFT HYPHEN in current software"
In reply to: Asmus Freytag: "Re: Confusion about weak and strong disunification"
Next in thread: verdy_p: "Re: Confusion about weak and strong disunification"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Thanks, Asmus Freytag for that very clear explanation and the
promptness. I request for such a clear explanation to be included in the
P&P document so that the UTC's stand on disunification can be clearer to
everyone.

Shriramana Sharma.

Next message: Shriramana Sharma: "Where went indic at unicode dot org?"
Previous message: Robert Abel: "Re: Support of U+00AD SOFT HYPHEN in current software"
In reply to: Asmus Freytag: "Re: Confusion about weak and strong disunification"
Next in thread: verdy_p: "Re: Confusion about weak and strong disunification"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Aug 16 2009 - 22:12:52 CDT