The "prohibited" encodings...

From: Andrew Lipscomb (ewwa@chattanooga.net)
Date: Tue Dec 29 2009 - 15:01:15 CST

Next message: Phillips, Addison: "RE: The "prohibited" encodings..."

Previous message: Phillips, Addison: "RE: HTML5 encodings (was: Re: BOCU patent)"
Next in thread: Phillips, Addison: "RE: The "prohibited" encodings..."
Reply: Phillips, Addison: "RE: The "prohibited" encodings..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

I think I just realized what they have in common--each one has the
ability to represent binary-identical strings in *more than one*
way.

Next message: Phillips, Addison: "RE: The "prohibited" encodings..."
Previous message: Phillips, Addison: "RE: HTML5 encodings (was: Re: BOCU patent)"
Next in thread: Phillips, Addison: "RE: The "prohibited" encodings..."
Reply: Phillips, Addison: "RE: The "prohibited" encodings..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Dec 29 2009 - 15:04:26 CST