RE: Latin-script keyboard layout (was RE: Quick Question About Korean Input Methods)

From: Peter Constable (petercon@microsoft.com)
Date: Wed Jan 06 2010 - 10:56:37 CST

Next message: philip chastney: "Re: Combining Box Characters?"

Previous message: announcements@unicode.org: "[Unicode Announcement] New lower individual member rates"
In reply to: Mahesh T. Pai: "Re: Latin-script keyboard layout (was RE: Quick Question About Korean Input Methods)"
Next in thread: Asmus Freytag: "Re: Latin-script keyboard layout (was RE: Quick Question About Korean Input Methods)"
Reply: Asmus Freytag: "Re: Latin-script keyboard layout (was RE: Quick Question About Korean Input Methods)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

From: unicode-bounce@unicode.org [mailto:unicode-bounce@unicode.org] On Behalf Of Mahesh T. Pai

> Slightly OT for the thread, but...
...
> What is the purpose of a standard if it is not to be supported??

Still off topic: Not a comment on ISO 9995 but in general: the fact that something has been made a standard does not imply that anybody in particular has to support it. It makes sense for a product to support a particular standard if in doing so business goals are met.

Peter

Next message: philip chastney: "Re: Combining Box Characters?"
Previous message: announcements@unicode.org: "[Unicode Announcement] New lower individual member rates"
In reply to: Mahesh T. Pai: "Re: Latin-script keyboard layout (was RE: Quick Question About Korean Input Methods)"
Next in thread: Asmus Freytag: "Re: Latin-script keyboard layout (was RE: Quick Question About Korean Input Methods)"
Reply: Asmus Freytag: "Re: Latin-script keyboard layout (was RE: Quick Question About Korean Input Methods)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jan 06 2010 - 11:02:47 CST