Re: U+2015 HORIZONTAL DASH, 2-em and 3-em dashes in the Chicago Manual of Style

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Tue Jan 26 2010 - 15:13:41 CST

  • Next message: Rick McGowan: "Re: U+2015 HORIZONTAL DASH, 2-em and 3-em dashes in the Chicago Manual of Style"

    On 26 Jan 2010, at 20:31, Jukka K. Korpela wrote:

    > Michael Everson wrote:
    >
    >> Normally one just uses two or three —— and ——— and kerns if there is
    >> any incidental space between them.
    >
    > By “kerning,” you mean manual tuning of spacing between characters,
    > not the automatic kerning that rendering software may perform when a
    > font contains kerning information for character pairs.

    Yes, that's what I do when I typeset.

    > Well, I don’t do kerning on your message, where I clearly see dashes
    > separated by a small amount of empty space. Actually, most people
    > have no idea of kerning, automatic or manual.

    So do I, because Everson Mono has a bit of space.

    > Maybe the lack of 2-em and 3-em dashes as characters in Unicode is
    > based on the assumption that successive em dashes are joining,
    > either because they have been so designed by the font designer (i.e.
    > the advance width is exactly the same as the dash width), or because
    > automatic kerning is specified and used. But these assumptions often
    > fail.

    I have no objection to adding a two-em dash and a three-em dash to the
    UCS.

    Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jan 26 2010 - 15:18:58 CST