RE: Optometry symbols proposal

From: Doug Ewell (doug@ewellic.org)
Date: Thu Apr 01 2010 - 10:42:18 CST

Next message: Andrew West: "Re: Optometry symbols proposal"

Previous message: Kent Karlsson: "Re: Optometry symbols proposal"
Maybe in reply to: Leo Broukhis: "Optometry symbols proposal"
Next in thread: Doug Ewell: "RE: Optometry symbols proposal"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Kent Karlsson <kent dot karlsson14 at comhem dot se> wrote:

> I understand that you meant this as an April 1 joke, but I would
> (passively) support these actually becoming encoded.

For what purpose? So people could write about the symbols themselves?

--
Doug Ewell  |  Thornton, Colorado, USA  |  http://www.ewellic.org
RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14  |  ietf-languages @ http://is.gd/2kf0s

Next message: Andrew West: "Re: Optometry symbols proposal"
Previous message: Kent Karlsson: "Re: Optometry symbols proposal"
Maybe in reply to: Leo Broukhis: "Optometry symbols proposal"
Next in thread: Doug Ewell: "RE: Optometry symbols proposal"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Apr 01 2010 - 10:44:31 CST