From: Kent Karlsson (kent.karlsson14@comhem.se)
Date: Mon Apr 12 2010 - 03:00:15 CDT
Den 2010-04-12 09.30, skrev "André Szabolcs Szelp" <a.sz.szelp@gmail.com>:
> BTW, I think your combining "small EZH as combining character" can be
> considered a variant of the COMBINING CEDILLE, or to be more exact, it
> _is_ a CEDILLE, and the orthography specifies it's placement for D, D
> WITH ACUTE and R (slightly more to the right than to the center),
> which does not even conflict as (an actual)* cedille is note employed
> for these letters otherwise; the CEDILLE itself is a little Z
> (zed-ille 'little Zed'), which was commonly written in the ezh form
> historically.
I agree.
> * what is called "R WITH CEDILLE" in Unicode is actually an "R WITH
> COMMA BELOW", as is the case with the other Lithuanian G WITH CEDILLE,
> L WITH CEDILLE, K WITH CEDILLE. It just has not been insisted on, as
> with Romanian, to separate the two distinct concepts of cedille and
> comma below.
However, the canonical decomposition of them involve U+0327, COMBINING
CEDILLA:
00C7;LATIN CAPITAL LETTER C WITH CEDILLA;Lu;0;L;0043 0327;;;;N;LATIN CAPITAL
LETTER C CEDILLA;;;00E7;
00E7;LATIN SMALL LETTER C WITH CEDILLA;Ll;0;L;0063 0327;;;;N;LATIN SMALL
LETTER C CEDILLA;;00C7;;00C7
0122;LATIN CAPITAL LETTER G WITH CEDILLA;Lu;0;L;0047 0327;;;;N;LATIN CAPITAL
LETTER G CEDILLA;;;0123;
0123;LATIN SMALL LETTER G WITH CEDILLA;Ll;0;L;0067 0327;;;;N;LATIN SMALL
LETTER G CEDILLA;;0122;;0122
0136;LATIN CAPITAL LETTER K WITH CEDILLA;Lu;0;L;004B 0327;;;;N;LATIN CAPITAL
LETTER K CEDILLA;;;0137;
0137;LATIN SMALL LETTER K WITH CEDILLA;Ll;0;L;006B 0327;;;;N;LATIN SMALL
LETTER K CEDILLA;;0136;;0136
013B;LATIN CAPITAL LETTER L WITH CEDILLA;Lu;0;L;004C 0327;;;;N;LATIN CAPITAL
LETTER L CEDILLA;;;013C;
013C;LATIN SMALL LETTER L WITH CEDILLA;Ll;0;L;006C 0327;;;;N;LATIN SMALL
LETTER L CEDILLA;;013B;;013B
0145;LATIN CAPITAL LETTER N WITH CEDILLA;Lu;0;L;004E 0327;;;;N;LATIN CAPITAL
LETTER N CEDILLA;;;0146;
0146;LATIN SMALL LETTER N WITH CEDILLA;Ll;0;L;006E 0327;;;;N;LATIN SMALL
LETTER N CEDILLA;;0145;;0145
0156;LATIN CAPITAL LETTER R WITH CEDILLA;Lu;0;L;0052 0327;;;;N;LATIN CAPITAL
LETTER R CEDILLA;;;0157;
0157;LATIN SMALL LETTER R WITH CEDILLA;Ll;0;L;0072 0327;;;;N;LATIN SMALL
LETTER R CEDILLA;;0156;;0156
015E;LATIN CAPITAL LETTER S WITH CEDILLA;Lu;0;L;0053 0327;;;;N;LATIN CAPITAL
LETTER S CEDILLA;;;015F;
015F;LATIN SMALL LETTER S WITH CEDILLA;Ll;0;L;0073 0327;;;;N;LATIN SMALL
LETTER S CEDILLA;;015E;;015E
0162;LATIN CAPITAL LETTER T WITH CEDILLA;Lu;0;L;0054 0327;;;;N;LATIN CAPITAL
LETTER T CEDILLA;;;0163;
0163;LATIN SMALL LETTER T WITH CEDILLA;Ll;0;L;0074 0327;;;;N;LATIN SMALL
LETTER T CEDILLA;;0162;;0162
0228;LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH CEDILLA;Lu;0;L;0045 0327;;;;N;;;;0229;
0229;LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH CEDILLA;Ll;0;L;0065 0327;;;;N;;;0228;;0228
1E08;LATIN CAPITAL LETTER C WITH CEDILLA AND ACUTE;Lu;0;L;00C7
0301;;;;N;;;;1E09;
1E09;LATIN SMALL LETTER C WITH CEDILLA AND ACUTE;Ll;0;L;00E7
0301;;;;N;;;1E08;;1E08
1E10;LATIN CAPITAL LETTER D WITH CEDILLA;Lu;0;L;0044 0327;;;;N;;;;1E11;
1E11;LATIN SMALL LETTER D WITH CEDILLA;Ll;0;L;0064 0327;;;;N;;;1E10;;1E10
1E1C;LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH CEDILLA AND BREVE;Lu;0;L;0228
0306;;;;N;;;;1E1D;
1E1D;LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH CEDILLA AND BREVE;Ll;0;L;0229
0306;;;;N;;;1E1C;;1E1C
1E28;LATIN CAPITAL LETTER H WITH CEDILLA;Lu;0;L;0048 0327;;;;N;;;;1E29;
1E29;LATIN SMALL LETTER H WITH CEDILLA;Ll;0;L;0068 0327;;;;N;;;1E28;;1E28
Interpreting *some* of them as if they instead had a canonical decomposition
involving
U+0326, COMBINING COMMA BELOW, seems less than ideal...
/kent k
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Apr 12 2010 - 03:03:09 CDT