From: Doug Ewell (doug@ewellic.org)
Date: Mon Apr 12 2010 - 20:24:03 CDT
Petr Tomasek <tomasek at etf dot cuni dot cz> wrote:
>> If you do want PUA assignments, it might be most appropriate to
>> propose these for inclusion in MUFI.
>
> Just curious: why MUFI and not SIL?
> http://scripts.sil.org/pua_home
The MUFI collection is focused on medieval letters, like the ones
Professor Bień is interested in. SIL's collection is more geared toward
letters used in modern orthographies.
-- Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA | http://www.ewellic.org RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14 | ietf-languages @ http://is.gd/2kf0s Â
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Apr 12 2010 - 20:27:25 CDT