From: Janusz S. Bieñ (jsbien@mimuw.edu.pl)
Date: Sun Apr 18 2010 - 01:09:48 CDT
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 André Szabolcs Szelp <a.sz.szelp@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
> One might consider adding corresponding
> K WITH COMMA BELOW
> G WITH COMMA BELOW
> L WITH COMMA BELOW
> R WITH COMMA BELOW
> with corresponding canonical decompositions, updating the reference
> glyphs for the existing WITH CEDILLA ones, and recommending using the
> new (comma) ones for Lithuanian.
>
> I do firmly believe that this would be desirable from a theoretical
> encoding point of view. However, from a practical point of view,
> knowing the issues involved with Romanian and without sponsorship by
> an official Lithuanian body, unfortunately, this is clearly
> infeasible.
Fortunately enough this doesn't seem relevant for my task :-)
Best regards
JSB
-- , dr hab. Janusz S. Bien, prof. UW - Uniwersytet Warszawski (Katedra Lingwistyki Formalnej) Prof. Janusz S. Bien - Warsaw University (Department of Formal Linguistics) jsbien@uw.edu.pl, jsbien@mimuw.edu.pl, http://fleksem.klf.uw.edu.pl/~jsbien/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Apr 18 2010 - 01:12:16 CDT