From: JAGANADH G (jaganadhg@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Apr 28 2010 - 12:31:17 CDT
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:50 PM, N. Ganesan <naa.ganesan@gmail.com> wrote:
> A question for linguists. In Indian scripts,
> there is a sign called halanta
> which is used to delete an
> inherent vowel /a/ in an Indic syllable.
>
> For example, in any Indic script,
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virama
>
> A syllable with /a/ + Halant = A "pure" consonant (with /a/ "killed")
> i.e.,
> [ka] + Halant = [k]
>
It is wrong.
[ka] - [a] = [k] not [ka] + [Halant] = [k]
like wise
[ka] - [a] + [i] = [ki]
> Usually, in early Brahmi, the halant "vowel-killer" sign is like a macron
> above any consonant syllable. In Tamil, halant is a dot (bindu) above
> of on the side a syllable, which is same as bindu for zero
> in Khmer inscriptions.
>
> My question: Can we call Indic Halanta (the "killer" of vowel,/a/)
> a form/kind of "Linguistic Zero" of PaaNini?
>
> What is ment by "Linguistic Zero"?
-- ********************************** JAGANADH G http://jaganadhg.freeflux.net/blog
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Apr 28 2010 - 12:34:37 CDT