Re: Roman Character Fragments

• Previous message: Christoph Päper: "Roman Character Fragments"
• In reply to: Christoph Päper: "Roman Character Fragments"
• Next in thread: Asmus Freytag: "Re: CJK Ideograph Fragments"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Christoph Päper <christoph dot paeper at crissov dot de> wrote:

> Considering the CJK Ideograph Fragments thread, do you think that
> someone could successfully (and therefore should) propose to encode
> the building blocks of the roman alphabet?
>
> I ask because some scholars have shown that our letter forms are not
> completely arbitrary.[Primus2004] Someone might want to write about
> these featural components, someone else might want to create a new
> systematic letter based upon them. Both would need some, perhaps
> differing sort of encoding support.

http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5242

--
Doug Ewell  |  Thornton, Colorado, USA  |  http://www.ewellic.org
RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14  |  ietf-languages @ http://is.gd/2kf0s ­

• Next message: Andrew Miller: "Re: Language info for U+1E1C and U+1E1D"
• Previous message: Christoph Päper: "Roman Character Fragments"
• In reply to: Christoph Päper: "Roman Character Fragments"
• Next in thread: Asmus Freytag: "Re: CJK Ideograph Fragments"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat May 15 2010 - 10:42:01 CDT