Re: Preparing a proposal for encoding a portable interpretable object code into Unicode (from Re: IUC 34 - call for participation open until May 26)

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Wed Jun 02 2010 - 05:41:20 CDT

  • Next message: Erkki I. Kolehmainen: "RE: Preparing a proposal for encoding a portable interpretable object code into Unicode (from Re: IUC 34 - call for participation open until May 26)"

    On 2 Jun 2010, at 10:51, William_J_G Overington wrote:

    > Well, that might well be the case historically, yet then the emoji were invented and they were encoded. The emoji existed at the time that they were encoded, yet they did not exist at the time that the standards were started.

    The characters to which you refer are used in the context of Japanese telephony, and are graphic characters.

    As Andrew pointed out, you are wasting your time and ours. "There is absolutely NO CHANCE that the UTC or WG2 will accept (or even waste their time discussing) your proposal as it is totally out of scope for character encoding standards."

    Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jun 02 2010 - 05:43:04 CDT