Re: Hexadecimal digits

From: Michael Everson (
Date: Fri Jun 04 2010 - 17:28:10 CDT

  • Next message: Doug Ewell: "RE: Hexadecimal digits"

    On 5 Jun 2010, at 00:04, Luke-Jr wrote:

    > While it is natural for glyphs to change, artificial character sets are not unheard of.

    Piffle. All writing systems are artefacts.

    > For example, Korean was designed such that each character, representing a syllable, was composed of sub-characters representing the individual sounds in that syllable. Despite its unnatural origin, numerous
    > people use it in their daily lives.

    Unnatural origin?

    This is trollery.

    Michael Everson *

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jun 04 2010 - 17:29:24 CDT