RE: Hexadecimal digits

From: Doug Ewell (doug@ewellic.org)
Date: Fri Jun 04 2010 - 17:42:48 CDT

Next message: David Starner: "Re: Hexadecimal digits"

Previous message: Doug Ewell: "RE: Hexadecimal digits"
Maybe in reply to: Luke-Jr: "Hexadecimal digits"
Next in thread: John W Kennedy: "Re: Hexadecimal digits"
Reply: John W Kennedy: "Re: Hexadecimal digits"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> Classical computing has always defined a kilobyte as 1024 bytes.
> I reject SI's attempt to force their broken system on what is an
> established de facto standard.

This is indeed trollery. SI and "kilo" and the decimal system have been
around far, far longer than so-called "classical computing."

--
Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA | http://www.ewellic.org
RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14 | ietf-languages @ is dot gd slash 2kf0s

Next message: David Starner: "Re: Hexadecimal digits"
Previous message: Doug Ewell: "RE: Hexadecimal digits"
Maybe in reply to: Luke-Jr: "Hexadecimal digits"
Next in thread: John W Kennedy: "Re: Hexadecimal digits"
Reply: John W Kennedy: "Re: Hexadecimal digits"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jun 04 2010 - 17:43:49 CDT