From: Masaaki Shibata (shibatamasaaki@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Jun 08 2010 - 02:55:58 CDT
Asmus, Mark, thank you for replying.
I'm very surprised. These document and test file must have been public
for years and I couldn't find any cautions or notations about that on
their site. This is very misleading. Most developers will reasonably
expect this text file will be useful.
I agree with Mark. I hope some UTC people will notice our argument.
Ref. I've got 17 cases of the same kind of contradiction on
LineBreakTest.txt. They are all seemed to be against LB25:
l.1137: ÷ [0.2] RIGHT PARENTHESIS (CP) ÷ [999.0] PERCENT SIGN (PO) ÷ [0.3]
l.1139: ÷ [0.2] RIGHT PARENTHESIS (CP) × [9.0] COMBINING DIAERESIS
(CM) ÷ [999.0] PERCENT SIGN (PO) ÷ [0.3]
l.1141: ÷ [0.2] RIGHT PARENTHESIS (CP) ÷ [999.0] DOLLAR SIGN (PR) ÷ [0.3]
l.1143: ÷ [0.2] RIGHT PARENTHESIS (CP) × [9.0] COMBINING DIAERESIS
(CM) ÷ [999.0] DOLLAR SIGN (PR) ÷ [0.3]
l.2569: ÷ [0.2] COMMA (IS) ÷ [999.0] DIGIT ZERO (NU) ÷ [0.3]
l.2571: ÷ [0.2] COMMA (IS) × [9.0] COMBINING DIAERESIS (CM) ÷ [999.0]
DIGIT ZERO (NU) ÷ [0.3]
l.3869: ÷ [0.2] PERCENT SIGN (PO) ÷ [999.0] LEFT PARENTHESIS (OP) ÷ [0.3]
l.3871: ÷ [0.2] PERCENT SIGN (PO) × [9.0] COMBINING DIAERESIS (CM) ÷
[999.0] LEFT PARENTHESIS (OP) ÷ [0.3]
l.4013: ÷ [0.2] DOLLAR SIGN (PR) ÷ [999.0] LEFT PARENTHESIS (OP) ÷ [0.3]
l.4015: ÷ [0.2] DOLLAR SIGN (PR) × [9.0] COMBINING DIAERESIS (CM) ÷
[999.0] LEFT PARENTHESIS (OP) ÷ [0.3]
l.4441: ÷ [0.2] SOLIDUS (SY) ÷ [999.0] DIGIT ZERO (NU) ÷ [0.3]
l.4443: ÷ [0.2] SOLIDUS (SY) × [9.0] COMBINING DIAERESIS (CM) ÷
[999.0] DIGIT ZERO (NU) ÷ [0.3]
l.5226: ÷ [0.2] LATIN SMALL LETTER E (AL) × [28.0] LATIN SMALL LETTER
Q (AL) × [28.0] LATIN SMALL LETTER U (AL) × [28.0] LATIN SMALL LETTER
A (AL) × [28.0] LATIN SMALL LETTER L (AL) × [28.0] LATIN SMALL LETTER
S (AL) × [7.01] SPACE (SP) × [13.02] FULL STOP (IS) ÷ [999.0] DIGIT
THREE (NU) × [25.03] DIGIT FIVE (NU) × [7.01] SPACE (SP) ÷ [18.0]
LATIN SMALL LETTER C (AL) × [28.0] LATIN SMALL LETTER E (AL) × [28.0]
LATIN SMALL LETTER N (AL) × [28.0] LATIN SMALL LETTER T (AL) × [28.0]
LATIN SMALL LETTER S (AL) ÷ [0.3]
Notice that they are the only cases i've found. There may be more.
I also took a glance at LineBreakTest-6_0_0d4.txt and found same
contradictions there too.
Thanks.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jun 08 2010 - 11:00:42 CDT