From: Doug Ewell (email@example.com)
Date: Sun Jun 13 2010 - 20:42:41 CDT
Stephen Slevinski <slevinski at gmail dot com> wrote:
> If Unicode includes simplified and traditional Chinese, why can't it
> include Binary SignWriting and Normalized SignWriting?
Are simplified and traditional Chinese perceived as breaking the
fundamental encoding models of Unicode?
-- Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA | http://www.ewellic.org RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14 | ietf-languages @ is dot gd slash 2kf0s
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jun 13 2010 - 20:44:39 CDT