Re: Writing a proposal for an unusual script: SignWriting

From: Doug Ewell (doug@ewellic.org)
Date: Sun Jun 13 2010 - 20:42:41 CDT

  • Next message: Asmus Freytag: "Re: Writing a proposal for an unusual script: SignWriting"

    Stephen Slevinski <slevinski at gmail dot com> wrote:

    > If Unicode includes simplified and traditional Chinese, why can't it
    > include Binary SignWriting and Normalized SignWriting?

    Are simplified and traditional Chinese perceived as breaking the
    fundamental encoding models of Unicode? 

    --
Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA | http://www.ewellic.org
RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14 | ietf-languages @ is dot gd slash 2kf0s ­

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jun 13 2010 - 20:44:39 CDT