Re: 001B, 001D, 001C

From: a a (abysta@yandex.ru)
Date: Thu Jul 08 2010 - 06:46:08 CDT

Next message: Michael S. Kaplan: "Re: 001B, 001D, 001C"

Previous message: philip chastney: "Re: Draft Proposal to encode the English Phonotypic Alphabet"
In reply to: abysta@yandex.ru: "001B, 001D, 001C"
Next in thread: Michael S. Kaplan: "Re: 001B, 001D, 001C"
Reply: Michael S. Kaplan: "Re: 001B, 001D, 001C"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Thanks for your replies.
I’m developing a keyboard layout based on US (Custom) which has 001B, 001D, 001C, 0020 defined for the Ctrl shift state. I don’t know should I leave them or not. The MKLC help recommends to avoid defining characters for both the Ctrl and Ctrl+Shift shift states, but also says: “You may notice specific keys in the Ctrl shift state are assigned when you load an existing keyboard layout. These key assignments are used in certain legacy applications like Microsoft HyperTerminal and should usually not be removed.”

Next message: Michael S. Kaplan: "Re: 001B, 001D, 001C"
Previous message: philip chastney: "Re: Draft Proposal to encode the English Phonotypic Alphabet"
In reply to: abysta@yandex.ru: "001B, 001D, 001C"
Next in thread: Michael S. Kaplan: "Re: 001B, 001D, 001C"
Reply: Michael S. Kaplan: "Re: 001B, 001D, 001C"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jul 08 2010 - 06:51:54 CDT