From: vanisaac@boil.afraid.org
Date: Mon Jul 19 2010 - 02:37:56 CDT
From: Erkki I Kolehmainen (eik@iki.fi)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The next UTC meeting will be on Aug 9-13, 2010 (in Redmond, WA, USA) and the
> next ISO/IEC JTC1/SC2/WG2 meeting will be on Oct 4-8, 2010 in Busan, Korea.
> Initial decisions can be made at these meetings. These decisions, however,
> can be made to stick (in practice, although not necessarily in principle.
> The kind of process that Jony proposes could not be implemented following
> the ISO rules that WG2 must follow.
>
> Incidentally, I would have preferred to have the two proposals (in both WG2
> N3862 and L2/10-249) separated.
Why?
> Sincerely, Erkki
>
>
> -----Alkuperäinen viesti-----
> Lähettäjä: unicode-bounce@unicode.org [mailto:unicode-bounce@unicode.org]
> Puolesta Jonathan Rosenne
> Lähetetty: 19. heinäkuuta 2010 9:12
> Vastaanottaja: 'unicode List'
> Aihe: RE: Indian Rupee Sign (U+20B9) proposal
>
>
> I think that this day and age, and in view of the importance and urgency of
> the issue as pointed out by several, there is no reason why both Unicode and
> ISO could not nor should not conduct an e-mail vote on Michael's proposal
> and be done with it.
>
>
> Jony
Is there any way to release 6.0.5, with only the new Rupee sign, right after Pusan? That would significantly reduce the proliferation of any ad hoc solutions, and give a concrete timeline to those chomping at the bit. Can the Euro encoding process be reproduced?
-Van
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jul 19 2010 - 02:39:58 CDT