From: David Starner (prosfilaes@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Jul 27 2010 - 12:19:25 CDT
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Andreas Prilop
<prilop4321@trashmail.net> wrote:
> U+0649 has (should have) four glyphs without any dots. This is no
> Arabic letter, but an Uighur letter. Therefore you should not use
> U+0649 for Arabic, Persian, Pashto, Urdu but only U+06CC.
That's wrong, though. MacArabic, Windows-1256 and ISO-8859-6 are all
standards for the encoding of Arabic. Thus U+0649 must be an Arabic
character; existing use in both those sets and in Unicode say that is.
-- Kie ekzistas vivo, ekzistas espero.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jul 27 2010 - 12:21:56 CDT