Re: ? Reasonable to propose stability policy on numeric type = decimal

From: Kenneth Whistler (kenw@sybase.com)
Date: Tue Jul 27 2010 - 14:38:02 CDT

Next message: vanisaac@boil.afraid.org: "Re: ? Reasonable to propose stability policy on numeric type = decimal"

Previous message: karl williamson: "Why does EULER CONSTANT not have math property and PLANCK CONSTANT does?"
Maybe in reply to: karl williamson: "? Reasonable to propose stability policy on numeric type = decimal"
Next in thread: vanisaac@boil.afraid.org: "Re: ? Reasonable to propose stability policy on numeric type = decimal"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

C. E. Whitehead said:

> I've not gone through many character charts though so I can't
> really speak as an expert as you all can; sorry I've not gotten
> to more; I will try to ...

For people who wish to pursue this issue further, the relevant
information is neatly summarized in the extracted property
data file:

http://www.unicode.org/Public/UNIDATA/extracted/DerivedNumericType.txt

That is what you should look at for efficiency, and
is basically what the UTC would be using for discussion
about this matter.

--Ken

Next message: vanisaac@boil.afraid.org: "Re: ? Reasonable to propose stability policy on numeric type = decimal"
Previous message: karl williamson: "Why does EULER CONSTANT not have math property and PLANCK CONSTANT does?"
Maybe in reply to: karl williamson: "? Reasonable to propose stability policy on numeric type = decimal"
Next in thread: vanisaac@boil.afraid.org: "Re: ? Reasonable to propose stability policy on numeric type = decimal"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jul 27 2010 - 14:39:54 CDT