Re: High dot/dot above punctuation?

From: Martin J. Dürst (duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp)
Date: Thu Jul 29 2010 - 23:20:47 CDT

  • Next message: Werner LEMBERG: "Re: UTS#10 (collation) : French backwards level 2, and word-breakers."

    Hello Joanma,

    On 2010/07/30 12:05, Juanma Barranquero wrote:
    > On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 04:52, "Martin J. Dürst"<duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> wrote:
    >
    >> It's very clear that we would get nowhere if we wanted to encode
    >> all these.
    >
    > The comment I respondend to talked about characters that are already encoded.

    Sorry, I didn't get that.

    >> In simpler words, you cannot use the needs of discussions about encoding
    >> (the meta-level) to determine encodings.
    >
    > Discussing arabic versus latin numerals is not more meta-level that
    > talking about upper vs. lowercase.

    Yes indeed. If these distinctions were only necessary when talking
    *about* these characters (meta-level) rather than when just using them
    (non-meta), then I would indeed agree that there is no reason to encode
    them separately.

    Regards, Martin.

    -- 
    #-# Martin J. Dürst, Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
    #-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp   mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jul 29 2010 - 23:24:15 CDT