From: Andrew West (andrewcwest@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Aug 04 2010 - 05:33:59 CDT
On 4 August 2010 09:19, William_J_G Overington
<wjgo_10009@btinternet.com> wrote:
Answering the two questions below on the assumption that s-VS1 <0073
FE00> were to be defined as a variation sequence for long s in all
type styles, and without giving any opinion on the merits or otherwise
of Karl's proposal in general, or specifically the merits of
double-encoding long s as a variation sequence.
> How could one express the following please using variation selectors and the Zero Width Joiner ZWJ in relation to the two character sequence sh?
>
> If you have a long s available, please use it, otherwise please use an ordinary s: furthermore, if you have a long s h ligature available please use that instead.
s-VS1-ZWJ-h
Note that there must be no character between a variation selector and
the base character it applies to, so the ZWJ must go after VS1.
> How could one express the following please using variation selectors and the Zero Width Joiner ZWJ in relation to the three character sequence ssi?
>
> If you have a long s available, please use it, otherwise please use an ordinary s: furthermore, if you have a long s long s i ligature available please use that instead.
The use of long s versus short s and ligaturing of these letters
varies widely geographically and historically and depending upon
typeface. The following examples would all be valid *if* s-VS1 were to
be defined as a variation sequence for long s (in all type styles):
s-VS1-ZWJ-s-VS1-ZWJ-i -- for a ligatured ſſi as in "miſſion" (usual in
18th century English typography)
s-VS1-s-i -- for a non-ligatured ſsi as in "illuſtriſsimos" (usual in
18th century Spanish typography)
s-VS1-ZWJ-s-i -- for a ligatured ſs plus i as in "bleſsings" (usual
for italics only in 16th and early 17th century English and French
typography)
s-s-VS1-ZWJ-i -- for s plus a ligatured ſi as in "utilisſima"
(sometimes in 16th century Italian typography)
Andrew
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Aug 04 2010 - 05:37:49 CDT