Re: Draft Proposal to add Variation Sequences for Latin and Cyrillic letters

• Previous message: Doug Ewell: "Dialects and orthographies in BCP 47 (was: Re: Draft Proposal to add Variation Sequences for Latin and Cyrillic letters)"
• In reply to: Christoph Päper: "Re: Draft Proposal to add Variation Sequences for Latin and Cyrillic letters"
• Next in thread: Karl Pentzlin: "Re: Draft Proposal to add Variation Sequences for Latin and Cyrillic letters"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Am Mittwoch, 4. August 2010 um 00:31 schrieb Christoph Päper:

CP> ... than making sure every instance of a letter is
CP> accompanied by the appropriate VS?

My proposal contains the idea of "implicit application" of variation
sequences by higher-level protocols. I will make this clearer in my
next version.

CP> How did you decide what to include in your proposal ...

I will make this clearer also in my next version, which will contain a
paragraph "characters vs. variants vs. glyphs".

- Karl Pentzlin

• Next message: verdy_p: "Standard fallback characters (was: Draft Proposal to add Variation A Sequences for Latin and Cyrillic letters)"
• Previous message: Doug Ewell: "Dialects and orthographies in BCP 47 (was: Re: Draft Proposal to add Variation Sequences for Latin and Cyrillic letters)"
• In reply to: Christoph Päper: "Re: Draft Proposal to add Variation Sequences for Latin and Cyrillic letters"
• Next in thread: Karl Pentzlin: "Re: Draft Proposal to add Variation Sequences for Latin and Cyrillic letters"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Aug 04 2010 - 15:05:47 CDT