RE: CSUR Tonal

From: Doug Ewell (doug@ewellic.org)
Date: Wed Aug 04 2010 - 17:20:55 CDT

Next message: David Starner: "Re: Draft Proposal to add Variation Sequences for Latin and Cyrillic letters"

Previous message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Dialects and orthographies in BCP 47"
Maybe in reply to: Doug Ewell: "RE: CSUR Tonal"
Next in thread: Kent Karlsson: "Re: CSUR Tonal"
Reply: Kent Karlsson: "Re: CSUR Tonal"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Kent Karlsson <kent dot karlsson14 at telia dot com> wrote:

> I see absolutely no point in reencoding the digits 0-9 even though
> 9 is (strangely) used to denote the value that is usually denoted 10.
> That is just a (very strange) usage, not different characters from
> the ordinary 0-9.

I suggested encoding all of them because U+0030 through U+0039 have the
Nd nature. Remember, this is just for the ConScript registry, not for
"real" Unicode, so it's more of an exercise than anything.

--
Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA | http://www.ewellic.org
RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14 | ietf-languages @ is dot gd slash 2kf0s

Next message: David Starner: "Re: Draft Proposal to add Variation Sequences for Latin and Cyrillic letters"
Previous message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Dialects and orthographies in BCP 47"
Maybe in reply to: Doug Ewell: "RE: CSUR Tonal"
Next in thread: Kent Karlsson: "Re: CSUR Tonal"
Reply: Kent Karlsson: "Re: CSUR Tonal"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Aug 04 2010 - 17:23:42 CDT