Re: number padless?

From: Otto Stolz (Otto.Stolz@uni-konstanz.de)
Date: Sat Aug 07 2010 - 11:41:45 CDT

Next message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Accessing alternate glyphs from plain text (from Re: Draft Proposal to add Variation Sequences for Latin and Cyrillic letters)"

Previous message: William_J_G Overington: "Re: Accessing alternate glyphs from plain text (from Re: Draft Proposal to add Variation Sequences for Latin and Cyrillic letters)"
In reply to: Murray Sargent: "RE: number padless?"
Next in thread: Lorna Priest: "Re: number padless?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Am 2010-08-07 04:19, schrieb Murray Sargent:
>In general to type in a character by its Unicode value,
> type in the hex value and then alt+x.

In some MS programs, e. g. the German version of MS Word,
it’s rather Alt-C, as Alt-X is endowed with some other meaning.

Best wishes,
Otto Stolz

Next message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Accessing alternate glyphs from plain text (from Re: Draft Proposal to add Variation Sequences for Latin and Cyrillic letters)"
Previous message: William_J_G Overington: "Re: Accessing alternate glyphs from plain text (from Re: Draft Proposal to add Variation Sequences for Latin and Cyrillic letters)"
In reply to: Murray Sargent: "RE: number padless?"
Next in thread: Lorna Priest: "Re: number padless?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Aug 07 2010 - 11:44:47 CDT