Re: Draft Proposal to add Variation Sequences for Latin and=D=A Cyrillic letters

• Previous message: verdy_p: "Re: Draft Proposal to add Variation Sequences for Latin and A Cyrillic letters"
• In reply to: verdy_p: "Re: Draft Proposal to add Variation Sequences for Latin and A Cyrillic letters"
• Next in thread: Janusz S. Bieñ: "long s (was: Draft Proposal to add Variation Sequences for Latin and Cyrillic letters)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

"verdy_p" <verdy underscore p at wanadoo dot fr> wrote:

> I am not convinced too. Because all what this proposal is supposed to
> solve is to allow an automted change of orthography so that SOME long
> s in old doucments using Fraktur style will become round s in some
> other antermediate style (like Antiqua) and then all of them will
> become "round" s later.

You missed some e-mails. The long s/round s sequences are gone from the
latest proposal.

--
Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA | http://www.ewellic.org
RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14 | ietf-languages @ is dot gd slash 2kf0s ­

• Next message: timpart@perdix.demon.co.uk: "Re: Draft Proposal to add Variation Sequences for Latin and Cyrillic letters"
• Previous message: verdy_p: "Re: Draft Proposal to add Variation Sequences for Latin and A Cyrillic letters"
• In reply to: verdy_p: "Re: Draft Proposal to add Variation Sequences for Latin and A Cyrillic letters"
• Next in thread: Janusz S. Bieñ: "long s (was: Draft Proposal to add Variation Sequences for Latin and Cyrillic letters)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Aug 07 2010 - 23:11:22 CDT