Re: [OT]: a strange language name abbreviation

From: Janusz S. Bieñ ([email protected])
Date: Mon Aug 09 2010 - 00:52:52 CDT

Next message: Otto Stolz: "Apostrophe in transliteration (was: Modifiers from punctuation)"

Previous message: Peter Constable: "RE: number padless?"
In reply to: Mark E. Shoulson: "Re: [OT]: a strange language name abbreviation"
Next in thread: Mark E. Shoulson: "Re: [OT]: a strange language name abbreviation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Thanks for all the comments.

For the time being the puzzle remains unsolved. Perhaps in the future
somebody will dig through the sources used by the author of the
dictionary and will find an explanation...

Best regards

Janusz

-- 
                     ,   
dr hab. Janusz S. Bien, prof. UW -  Uniwersytet Warszawski (Katedra Lingwistyki Formalnej)
Prof. Janusz S. Bien - Warsaw University (Department of Formal Linguistics)
[email protected], [email protected], http://fleksem.klf.uw.edu.pl/~jsbien/

Next message: Otto Stolz: "Apostrophe in transliteration (was: Modifiers from punctuation)"
Previous message: Peter Constable: "RE: number padless?"
In reply to: Mark E. Shoulson: "Re: [OT]: a strange language name abbreviation"
Next in thread: Mark E. Shoulson: "Re: [OT]: a strange language name abbreviation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Aug 09 2010 - 00:56:47 CDT