Re: Apostrophe in transliteration (was: Modifiers from punctuation)

From: Karl Pentzlin (karl-pentzlin@acssoft.de)
Date: Mon Aug 09 2010 - 09:29:25 CDT

Next message: Andrew West: "Re: Apostrophe in transliteration (was: Modifiers from punctuation)"

Previous message: Otto Stolz: "Apostrophe in transliteration (was: Modifiers from punctuation)"
In reply to: Otto Stolz: "Apostrophe in transliteration (was: Modifiers from punctuation)"
Next in thread: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: Apostrophe in transliteration (was: Modifiers from punctuation)"
Reply: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: Apostrophe in transliteration (was: Modifiers from punctuation)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Am Montag, 9. August 2010 um 16:18 schrieb Otto Stolz:

OS> Which one is recommended, when transliterating, as the Latin equvalent
OS> of the Cyrillic letter Soft Sign (044C)?

U+02B9 MODIFIER LETTER PRIME

- Karl Pentzlin

Next message: Andrew West: "Re: Apostrophe in transliteration (was: Modifiers from punctuation)"
Previous message: Otto Stolz: "Apostrophe in transliteration (was: Modifiers from punctuation)"
In reply to: Otto Stolz: "Apostrophe in transliteration (was: Modifiers from punctuation)"
Next in thread: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: Apostrophe in transliteration (was: Modifiers from punctuation)"
Reply: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: Apostrophe in transliteration (was: Modifiers from punctuation)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Aug 09 2010 - 09:33:18 CDT