Re: [unicode] Telugu Unicode Encoding Review

From: suzuki toshiya (mpsuzuki@hiroshima-u.ac.jp)
Date: Sat Oct 16 2010 - 12:38:03 CDT

  • Next message: Mark Davis ☕: "Re: Derived age regexp"

    Hi,

    I've never heard any comments about the reservation
    of the codepoints to making the code chart structure
    similar among multiple script, no posive, no negative.
    So your comment is interesting. Could you tell me more
    about what kind of disadvantages you're thinking of?

    If Telugu users are using 7-bit or 8-bit encoding
    and they want to use more codepoints for unencoded
    characters, the disadvantage (the reduction of the
    available codepoint) is clear. But... you're talking
    about Unicode.

    Regards,
    mpsuzuki

    Kiran Kumar Chava wrote (2010/10/17 2:06):
    > Hi,
    >
    >
    > At the link, http://geek.chavakiran.com/archives/55 , I tried to understand
    > Telugu Unicode encoding and then I tried to do an out of box review of this
    > encoding. Kindly let me know if I am missing something, mentioned as missing
    > in above article are really missing or not. Any other views...
    >
    >
    > Thanks in advance,
    >
    > Kiran Kumar Chava
    >
    > http://chavakiran.com
    >

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Oct 16 2010 - 12:44:36 CDT