Re: Ruby below?

From: Jukka K. Korpela (jkorpela@cs.tut.fi)
Date: Fri Jan 14 2011 - 13:11:46 CST

Next message: CE Whitehead: "RE: Increasing character limit for registration in internet domain names: 76 or 68 or 91 or 83 or 64 higher the better"

Previous message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Ruby below?"
In reply to: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Ruby below?"
Next in thread: Martin J. Dürst: "Re: Ruby below?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Philippe Verdy wrote:

> You have mixed CSS properties here.

I haven't.

> The "vertical-align:" property
> does not have such value with a measure unit.

It does: http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visudet.html#propdef-vertical-align

> If you want to
> relatively adjust the vertical positioning, use "top:" or "bottom:",
> and set "position:relative".

On occasion that might be better, but it's different, and vertical-align was
quite sufficient for proving that on the major browser that supports Ruby
markup in HTML, the Ruby annotation can be placed below the annotated text.

-- 
Yucca, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/

Next message: CE Whitehead: "RE: Increasing character limit for registration in internet domain names: 76 or 68 or 91 or 83 or 64 higher the better"
Previous message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Ruby below?"
In reply to: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Ruby below?"
Next in thread: Martin J. Dürst: "Re: Ruby below?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jan 14 2011 - 13:14:04 CST