Re: [unicode] RE: Characters

From: mpsuzuki@hiroshima-u.ac.jp
Date: Fri Feb 11 2011 - 12:21:42 CST

Next message: John Burger: "Re: Characters"

Previous message: Doug Ewell: "RE: Characters"
In reply to: anbu@peoplestring.com: "RE: Characters"
Next in thread: Asmus Freytag: "Re: Characters"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

I'm afraid that some subscribers of this list may have
concerns about your insist of the patent related with
the frequency of the characters:
http://www.unicode.org/mail-arch/unicode-ml/y2011-m01/0052.html

If there is a non-intuitive results from the investigation
about the frequency of the character usages, it would be
an intellectual property?

Regards,
mpsuzuki

On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:11:24 -0500
<anbu@peoplestring.com> wrote:

>No, this is not a joke. Whenever I post something, you are making fun of
>it. What's the problem? I seriously want to know the characters present in
>Unicode 6 and each of their frequencies of usage.
>
>On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:03:20 -0700, "Doug Ewell" <doug@ewellic.org> wrote:
>>
>> I assume this is a joke.
>>
>> --
>> Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA | http://www.ewellic.org
>> RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14 | ietf-languages @ is dot gd slash 2kf0s __
>

Next message: John Burger: "Re: Characters"
Previous message: Doug Ewell: "RE: Characters"
In reply to: anbu@peoplestring.com: "RE: Characters"
Next in thread: Asmus Freytag: "Re: Characters"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Feb 11 2011 - 12:23:46 CST