Re: Encoding of invented items (from RE: Assigning a plane for mapping digits for many different bases)

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Thu Mar 10 2011 - 14:20:37 CST

  • Next message: Doug Ewell: "RE: Encoding of invented items (from RE: Assigning a plane for mapping digits for many different bases)"

    On 10 Mar 2011, at 21:07, Luke-Jr wrote:

    > On Thursday, March 10, 2011 2:28:13 pm Michael Everson wrote:
    >
    >>> The problem is that it seems to no longer be maintained--still missing any mention of the proposed Tonal encoding I submitted about 4 months ago using the E9D0-E9EF range.
    >>
    >> Oh. That wasn't a ConScript, so it was out of scope.
    >
    > The dictionary disagrees.

    The dictionary doesn't run ConScript.

    A set of extensions to the European digits does not constitute a constructed writing system.

    > Quite frankly, this response, in addition to being in the wrong forum (the actual submission going completely ignored) looks like an excuse for a personal closed-mindedness.

    This discussion is extra specially closed now.

    Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Mar 10 2011 - 14:24:00 CST