Re: [unicode] Que ligature

• Previous message: Andrew West: "Re: Que ligature"
• In reply to: Leo Broukhis: "Que ligature"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Hi,

"Letting it the text rendering system with intelligent
fonts, like OpenType, to choose the ligature glyph
without its own character codepoint" is unacceptable solution?
The ligature has been so widely used and some systems
have the special character codepoint for the ligature?

Regards,
mpsuzuki

Leo Broukhis wrote:
> There exists a ligature for the Latin postpositional conjunction -que
> that looks like q with a smaller yogh glued to it, similar to but not
> exactly "qȝ":
>
> http://typophile.com/node/72762
>
> How should that ligature be treated in Unicode?
>
> 1. It should be encoded.
> 2. It should be represented by q + ZWJ + ȝ.
> 3. It should be represented by q + ZWJ + u + ZWJ + e.
> 4. some other way?
>
> Thanks,
> Leo
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>

• Next message: Leo Broukhis: "Re: Que ligature"
• Previous message: Andrew West: "Re: Que ligature"
• In reply to: Leo Broukhis: "Que ligature"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Jun 04 2011 - 13:38:59 CDT