> From: Doug Ewell <doug_at_ewellic.org>
> I assume that the questioner is trying to make a point, or "gather dirt"
> on the Unicode Standard or the Consortium. Maybe they want to "prove"
> that the Consortium is unresponsive to user needs or overly fixated on
> commercial goals, or that the ISO process is inherently better than the
> Unicode process.
If anyone needs a character witness to the fact that Unicode responds to
completely non-commercial needs and is incredibly responsive and helpful in
that process, I will be the first in line.
> --
> Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA | RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14
> www.ewellic.org | www.facebook.com/doug.ewell | @DougEwell
Van
Received on Fri Jun 17 2011 - 03:35:46 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Jun 17 2011 - 03:35:47 CDT