The former. As you and I independently commented, it makes sense to see the virama as being in a distribution class together with matras and, therefore, for the virama to precede candrabindu.
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: unicode-bounce_at_unicode.org [mailto:unicode-bounce_at_unicode.org] On Behalf Of Shriramana Sharma
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 9:27 AM
To: Unicode Discussion List
Subject: Re: Sanskrit nasalized L
On Monday 20 June 2011 12:54 AM, Peter Constable wrote:
> Here's a related text element:
> [cid:image001.png_at_01CC2E7B.B6DA0BA0]
> That’s another that the original Uniscribe implementation didn’t allow but that we’ve become aware of as needing to be supported.
Peter -- what sequence did you use to achieve this display,
LA + VIRAMA + CANDRABINDU + LA
or
LA + CANDRABINDU + VIRAMA + LA
I personally feel the former is the "correct" one but would like to hear your views.
-- Shriramana SharmaReceived on Wed Jun 22 2011 - 00:50:43 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jun 22 2011 - 00:50:45 CDT