RE: Sanskrit nasalized L

From: Peter Constable <petercon_at_microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 05:50:23 +0000

LA + VIRAMA + LA + CANDRABINDU would display L-LA with the candrabindu on the right-hand element of the consonant cluster.


Peter

From: tulasi [mailto:tulasird_at_gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 10:46 PM
To: Vinodh Rajan
Cc: Shriramana Sharma; Unicode Discussion List; unicode_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Sanskrit nasalized L

LA + VIRAMA + LA => LLA
LLA + CANDRABINDU => LLACANDRABINDU
CANDRABINDU sits on top of conjunct LLA

so,
LA + VIRAMA + LA + CANDRABINDU => LLACANDRABINDU
is natural writing.

Tulasi


From: Vinodh Rajan <vinodh.vinodh_at_gmail.com<mailto:vinodh.vinodh_at_gmail.com>>
Date: Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:10 AM
Subject: Re: Sanskrit nasalized L
To: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa_at_gmail.com<mailto:samjnaa_at_gmail.com>>
Cc: Unicode Discussion List <unicode_at_unicode.org<mailto:unicode_at_unicode.org>>

ल्‍ँल

LA + VIRAMA + ZWJ + CHANDRABINDU + LA

(BTW Without ZWJ ल्ँल)

V


On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 9:57 PM, Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa_at_gmail.com<mailto:samjnaa_at_gmail.com>> wrote:
On Monday 20 June 2011 12:54 AM, Peter Constable wrote:
Here's a related text element:
[cid:image001.png_at_01CC2E7B.B6DA0BA0]<mailto:[cid:image001.png_at_01CC2E7B.B6DA0BA0]>

That’s another that the original Uniscribe implementation didn’t allow but that we’ve become aware of as needing to be supported.

LA + VIRAMA + CANDRABINDU + LA

or

LA + CANDRABINDU + VIRAMA + LA

I personally feel the former is the "correct" one but would like to hear your views.

--
Shriramana Sharma

Received on Wed Jun 22 2011 - 00:51:28 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jun 22 2011 - 00:51:28 CDT