RE: Sanskrit nasalized L

Yes, I'm agreeing with you: for Devanagari, I'd use <la, virama, candrabindu, la> and not a sequence with ZWJ.

Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: unicode-bounce_at_unicode.org [mailto:unicode-bounce_at_unicode.org] On Behalf Of Shriramana Sharma
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2011 3:39 AM
To: Unicode Discussion List
Subject: Re: Sanskrit nasalized L

On Thursday 23 June 2011 11:15 AM, Peter Constable wrote:
> The examples shown here and that I've assumed are Devanagari script.
> Grantha or other scripts that sub-join "C2" consonants would, indeed,
> be another matter. And even for Devanagari, while it may be a valid
> sequence I don't think I'd recommend it.

Just clarifying -- you mean that:

LA + VIRAMA + ZWJ + CHANDRABINDU + LA

*with* a joiner is *not* recommended, right?

--
Shriramana Sharma