Re: Mail filtering, and Tulasi - (was) Re: Everson's Ahom proposal

Does this mean that Tulasi is not at all on the list? I request the
moderator to look into this issue and take appropriate action.

On 6/26/11, Asmus Freytag <asmusf_at_ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> On 6/26/2011 3:28 AM, Petr Tomasek wrote:
>>
>> It seems thus that tulasi had harvested the "emails" he/she found
>> within the unicode mailing lists' archive...
>>
>>> I request people replying to people to verify whether a mail is
>>> directed to the list or to them personally.
>>>
>
>
> Thanks for alerting me to this. I reviewed the mail headers on messages
> I have received from "tulasi" and have found, likewise, that these
> messages have reached me directly (that I, via BCC) and not, as the
> "from" field suggests, via the list.
>
> I would consider this practice deceptive.
>
> Many people send me messages directly as well as via the list. I don't
> have problems with that, because these people do this openly, using the
> "cc" field. Even if I receive the direct copy first, I know that what I
> have received is a copy, and not the message that has gone through the
> list (and seen by others).
>
> When faced with deceptive mailings of any kind, I usually end up finding
> a way to rout these into my junk folder in the most expeditiously
> possible way.
>
> I hope everybody knows how to deal with deceptive email.
>
> A./
>
>
>

-- 
Shriramana Sharma