Re: UTS46 "transitional period"

From: Mark Davis ☕ <mark_at_macchiato.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 16:03:26 -0700

For Chrome, we're working on UTS46 support, but I can't comment on schedule.

Mark
*— Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —*

On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 15:25, Chris Weber <chris_at_lookout.net> wrote:

> On 6/28/2011 11:20 PM, Peter Krefting wrote:
>
>> Den 2011-06-29 04:41:22 skrev Chris Weber <chris_at_lookout.net>:
>>
>> I was trying to understand the implementation differences in some
>>> browsers and registrars. Using your example from UTS46
>>> http://xn--fa-hia.de/
>>>
>>> Opera - error, doesn't resolve
>>>
>>
>> We have recently implemented support for IDNA 2008 internally, but it was
>> not finished in time for the just recently released Opera 11.50. Our latest
>> greatest internal test build resolves that URL just fine (not that there is
>> much interesting to see).
>>
>>
> Thanks for the responses Mark and Peter. So do you happen to know if
> Chrome, Safari, and Firefox are implementing IDNA2008 already or if they
> punycode example resolves under their implementation of IDNA2003 because of
> the "murky" processing rules?
>
> Best regards,
> Chris
>
>
Received on Wed Jun 29 2011 - 18:05:41 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jun 29 2011 - 18:05:42 CDT